|Review Leadership Crisis at Steelworks’ Xiamen Plant (Tan, H. H. & Joseph, F., 2016): Unit 2.PDFPreview the document In a 7-8 page paper (not including title page, abstract, references and exhibits), address the following elements, identifying each one with a major section heading and subheadings as needed: Provide a summary of the case (at least one page), including the setting, key stakeholders, and primary issues to be addressed. Taking the perspective of C.H. Chan, what do you think happened? How would you describe the relationship between Kumar and Chan? To what extent was there trust between them? To what extent did the cultural differences between (a) Kumar and Chan, and (b) Southern Metals and Steelworks play a role in this episode? What could Kumar have done differently in his relationship with Chan and in the Project C3 change initiative? Provide a Biblical perspective on your analysis. Offer specific Bible verses to support your comments. As you address each section, be sure to apply specific concepts and practices from the assigned readings for Units 1-2. In developing your response, you must leverage at least three sources, two of which must be from scholarly, peer-reviewed publications. Although you are encouraged to conduct your own research, you may include the text as one of the scholarly sources. Provide your responses in an MS Word or PDF-formatted document, using specific section headings to differentiate each answer by question number/title. The response should be formatted as a double-spaced document with a title page, per APA Guidelines. Please do not provide block quotations from the case study, rather, provide your own summary and analysis of the case.