Employees who are motivated to work long and hard are generally more productive than those who are not.

I just need the last question answered I included the whole thing for background: Employees who are motivated to work long and hard are generally more productive than those who are not. On an aggregate basis, this will have a positive effect on economic development and national competitiveness. Some cultures place less value on leisure time. This can impact many social and employment aspects, such as vacations, holidays, and the amount of money spent on leisure activities. Although the same tasks performed in different countries will have different probabilities of success, different rewards for success, and different consequences for failure, people will usually work harder at any task when the reward for success is greater than the consequence of failure. The greatest enthusiasm for work exists when high uncertainty of success is combined with the likelihood of a very positive reward for success and little or none for failure. Hofstede’s study of managers from more than fifty countries defines a person who ranks high on the masculinity-femininity index as someone who admires the successful achiever, has little sympathy for the unfortunate, and prefers to be better than others. Such a person believes that that it is better “to live to work” than “to work to live.” However, those attitudes, as well as a preference for growth and over quality of life and environment, are not shared by all. Further, countries also differ in the degree to which individuals are assertive, confrontational, and aggressive in their relationships with others. Thus, country managers will be motivated in a variety of different ways. QUESTION: Why is global Human Resource Management (HRM) more difficult than domestic HRM? How can staffing a foreign facility with locals alleviate some of these HRM difficulties?